[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220132220.GB28882@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:22:20 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Linaro Networking <linaro-networking@...aro.org>,
Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevents: Add (missing) default case for switch blocks
* Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 20 February 2015 at 17:11, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> >> Maybe we should break that enum into two; one for devices
> >> and one for the core interface and avoid the problem that
> >> way.
> >
> > Yeah, that would do the trick.
>
> Thanks for your suggestions. Just to confirm (before I spam lists with
> patches), is
> this somewhat similar to what you are looking for ?
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/clockchips.h b/include/linux/clockchips.h
> index 59af26b54d15..80b669cb836d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clockchips.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clockchips.h
> @@ -32,17 +32,24 @@ enum clock_event_nofitiers {
> struct clock_event_device;
> struct module;
>
> -/* Clock event mode commands */
> +/* Clock event mode commands for legacy ->set_mode(): OBSOLETE */
> enum clock_event_mode {
> CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED = 0,
> CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN,
> CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC,
> CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT,
> CLOCK_EVT_MODE_RESUME,
> -
> - /* Legacy ->set_mode() callback doesn't support below modes */
> };
>
> +/* Clock event modes, only for core's internal use */
> +enum clock_event_dev_mode {
> + CLOCK_EVT_DEV_MODE_UNUSED = 0,
What is 'unused' - not initialized yet?
> + CLOCK_EVT_DEV_MODE_SHUTDOWN,
> + CLOCK_EVT_DEV_MODE_PERIODIC,
> + CLOCK_EVT_DEV_MODE_ONESHOT,
> + CLOCK_EVT_DEV_MODE_RESUME,
What is 'resume' mode?
> + CLOCK_EVT_DEV_MODE_ONESHOT_STOPPED, /* This would be the new
> mode which I will add later */
What does this mode express?
So for state machines it's important to document the states
and the transitions between them very clearly - please
start with that.
> +};
Also, this should not be in a generic header, it should be
somewhere internal in kernel/time/.
> Ofcourse, we also need to replace 'clock_event_mode' with
> 'clock_event_dev_mode' and 'CLOCK_EVT_MODE_*' with
> 'CLOCK_EVT_DEV_MODE_*' in all core code..
Yes.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists