[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220160222.4a7817d7@bee>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:02:22 +0100
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@...gnu.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/15] cpu-model/s390: Introduce
S390 CPU models
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:55:32 +0100
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de> wrote:
> > /**
> > * S390CPUClass:
> > * @parent_realize: The parent class' realize handler.
> > @@ -52,6 +69,11 @@ typedef struct S390CPUClass {
> > void (*load_normal)(CPUState *cpu);
> > void (*cpu_reset)(CPUState *cpu);
> > void (*initial_cpu_reset)(CPUState *cpu);
> > + bool is_active[ACCEL_ID_MAX]; /* model enabled for given host and accel */
> > + bool is_host[ACCEL_ID_MAX]; /* model markes host for given accel */
> > + uint64_t *fac_list; /* active facility list */
> > + S390CPUMachineProps *mach; /* machine specific properties */
> > + S390CPUProcessorProps *proc; /* processor specific properties */
>
> Sorry, same here. Just put the structs straight into the class struct.
Yep, consistent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists