[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220171249.210a0236@bee>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:12:49 +0100
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@...gnu.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>, frank.blaschka@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 10/15] cpu-model/s390: Add cpu class
initialization routines
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:02:42 -0800
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net> wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * s390_test_facility - test if given facility bit is set facility list
> > + * of given cpu class
> > + * @class: address of cpu class to test
> > + * @nr: bit number to test
> > + *
> > + * Returns: true in case it is set
> > + * false in case it is not set
> > + */
> > +bool s390_test_facility(S390CPUClass *cc, unsigned long nr)
> > +{
> > + if (cc) {
> > + return test_facility(nr, cc->fac_list) ? true : false;
> > + }
> > + return false;
> > +}
>
> Where do you see this being used?
Good spot, it's not being used yet. It's planned to be used with a patch that implements zPCI
related instructions on QEMU side. Maybe you have seen the discussion from Frank Blaschka in this
e-mail list in regard to that.
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists