[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220161259.GL13659@leverpostej>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:12:59 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: fix virtual irq demuxer related comments
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:14:25PM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:43:12PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Replace remaining 'Dumb' occurrences by 'Virtual'.
> > Remove inappropriate notes in kerneldoc headers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
>
> Thanks, squished into the other one.
Would you be able to drop the virtual demuxer patch(es) for now?
The fundamental problem here is that a physical IRQ is shared by wakeup
and IRQF_NO_SUSPEND handlers. Neither the virtual demuxer nor the flag
approach solve that problem.
Boris and I have spoken on IRC and have some ideas as to what we could
do, but no code just yet.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists