lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:59:14 +0100
From:	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To:	Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:	qemu-devel@...gnu.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 09/15] cpu-model/s390: Add KVM VM
 attribute interface routines



On 20.02.15 16:18, Michael Mueller wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:59:20 +0100
> Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de> wrote:
> 
>>> +typedef struct S390ProcessorProps {
>>> +    uint64_t cpuid;
>>> +    uint16_t ibc;
>>> +    uint8_t  pad[6];
>>> +    uint64_t fac_list[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_UINT64];
>>> +} S390ProcessorProps;
>>> +
>>> +typedef struct S390MachineProps {
>>> +    uint64_t cpuid;
>>> +    uint32_t ibc_range;
>>> +    uint8_t  pad[4];
>>> +    uint64_t fac_list_mask[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_UINT64];
>>> +    uint64_t fac_list[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_UINT64];
>>> +} S390MachineProps;  
>>
>> What are those structs there for? To convert between a kvm facing
>> interface to an internal interface?
> 
> Yes, that's their current use, but if the interface structs: 
> 
> +struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_processor {
> +       __u64 cpuid;
> +       __u16 ibc;
> +       __u8  pad[6];
> +       __u64 fac_list[256];
> +};
> +
> +/* kvm S390 machine related attributes are r/o */
> +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE                1
> +struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_machine {
> +       __u64 cpuid;
> +       __u32 ibc_range;
> +       __u8  pad[4];
> +       __u64 fac_mask[256];
> +       __u64 fac_list[256];
> +};
> 
> are visible here, I'll reuse them... But stop, that will not work in the 
> --disable-kvm case... I need them!

I meant it the other way around - do KVM specific patching of the cpu
types from kvm.c.

But please give a nutshell explanation on what exactly you're patching
at all here.


Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ