[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220174750.GJ8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:47:50 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] eeprom: sunxi: Move the SID driver to the eeprom
framework
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:08:40PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> +static int sunxi_sid_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + const struct of_device_id *device;
> + struct eeprom_sid *sid;
> + struct resource *res;
> + struct eeprom_device *eeprom;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + int rval;
> +
> + sid = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*sid), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sid)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + eeprom = &sid->eeprom;
...
> + rval = eeprom_register(eeprom);
> + if (rval)
> + return rval;
...
> +static int sunxi_sid_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct eeprom_device *eeprom = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + return eeprom_unregister(eeprom);
As pointed out in the previous patch, this is unsafe as the eeprom
structure contains a struct device.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists