[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220200226.GD23367@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 21:02:26 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Jan \"Yenya\" Kasprzak" <kas@...muni.cz>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7 linux-next] wan: cosa: replace current->state by
set_current_state()
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:31:53AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 19:58 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Maybe this might be self documented in set_current_state(),
> as we have about 120 calls to __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 41c60e5302d7..26133da6445e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -275,7 +275,11 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
> #define set_current_state(state_value) \
> do { \
> current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \
> - set_mb(current->state, (state_value)); \
> + if (__builtin_constant_p(state_value) && \
> + (state_value) == TASK_RUNNING) \
> + current->state = (state_value); \
> + else \
> + set_mb(current->state, (state_value)); \
> } while (0)
lkml.kernel.org/r/20150206163947.GR21418@...ns.programming.kicks-ass.net
The problem is that there _might_ be someone relying on that barrier.
Its (very) unlikely, but you don't want to risk subtle borkage just
because. And I'm too lazy to go audit all of them :/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists