[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1502210028160.19198@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 00:29:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
cc: jpoimboe@...hat.com, sjenning@...hat.com, vojtech@...e.cz,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, mbenes@...e.cz,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] livepatch: RCU protect struct klp_func all the time when
used in klp_ftrace_handler()
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Petr Mladek wrote:
> func->new_func has been accessed after rcu_read_unlock() in klp_ftrace_handler()
> and therefore the access was not protected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
> ---
> kernel/livepatch/core.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> index ff7f47d026ac..cde66192e20e 100644
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> @@ -314,12 +314,12 @@ static void notrace klp_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip,
> rcu_read_lock();
> func = list_first_or_null_rcu(&ops->func_stack, struct klp_func,
> stack_node);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> -
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!func))
> - return;
> + goto unlock;
>
> klp_arch_set_pc(regs, (unsigned long)func->new_func);
> +unlock:
> + rcu_read_unlock();
This can't hurt, even though the only scenario where this could in theory
trigger as a bug (module removal) is non-issue now.
But I'd like to take it nevertheless ... Seth, Josh?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists