linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm512x: Allow independently overclocking PLL, DAC and DSP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150221093328.GF6236@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 21 Feb 2015 18:33:28 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Rosin <peda@...ator.liu.se>
Cc:	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm512x: Allow independently overclocking PLL,
 DAC and DSP

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:02:48PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
> 
> When using non-standard rates, a relatively small amount of overclocking
> can make a big difference to a number of cases.

This is all basically fine but I'm wondering why this is being
configured via sysfs and not via ALSA controls?  It's going to be more
fiddly for people to have to work with both control methods when they
need to configure these things.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)