linux-kernel - Re: 1e918876 breaks r8169 (linux-3.18+)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:22:26 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:	Tomas Szepe <szepe@...erecords.com>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Marco Berizzi <pupilla@...mail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 1e918876 breaks r8169 (linux-3.18+)

On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 11:31 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Tomas Szepe <szepe@...erecords.com> wrote:
> > > I tried to reproduce this without success so far on my RTL8168d/8111d device.
> > > I've been running 40 parallel netperf TCP_STREAM tests (1gbit) for the
> > > last 5 hours and so far I saw no watchdog tx timeouts.
> > > 
> > > I'll keep this running for a day or so to see if it just takes more time
> > > to trigger.
> > 
> > So, how's this coming along?  Don't you think the patch should be reverted
> > until the problem is diagnosed/understood/fixed?
> 
> Sorry.
> 
> David, please consider reverting
> 
> 1e918876853aa85435e0f17fd8b4a92dcfff53d6
> (r8169: add support for Byte Queue Limits)
> 
> 	and
> 
> 0bec3b700d106a8b0a34227b2976d1a582f1aab7
> (r8169: add support for xmit_more)
> 
> I cannot reproduce any hangs (tried for 2days with 40 parallel
> netperfs using both 100mbit and 1gbit receiver).
> 
> And I don't see anything wrong with the change either.
> Seems like some revisions of the HW are just dodgy?
> 
> I hate giving up, but I have no means to diagnose this any further.
> Even reporter says it doesn't affect all of his r8169 nics.
> 
> So I think the change is correct per se, but might be revealing some
> HW/firmware bug.

Hold on.

I believe there is one race in the way you access skb->xmit_more _after_

txd->opts1 = cpu_to_le32(status);

After this point, TX might have completed and TX completion already have
freed skb

Could Tomas try following fix ?

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
index ad0020af2193..f2764366a36c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
@@ -7050,6 +7050,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t rtl8169_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	u32 opts[2];
 	int frags;
 	bool stop_queue;
+	bool xmit_more;
 
 	if (unlikely(!TX_FRAGS_READY_FOR(tp, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags))) {
 		netif_err(tp, drv, dev, "BUG! Tx Ring full when queue awake!\n");
@@ -7091,7 +7092,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t rtl8169_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	txd->opts2 = cpu_to_le32(opts[1]);
 
 	netdev_sent_queue(dev, skb->len);
-
+	xmit_more = skb->xmit_more;
 	skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
 
 	/* Force memory writes to complete before releasing descriptor */
@@ -7108,7 +7109,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t rtl8169_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	stop_queue = !TX_FRAGS_READY_FOR(tp, MAX_SKB_FRAGS);
 
-	if (!skb->xmit_more || stop_queue ||
+	if (!xmit_more || stop_queue ||
 	    netif_xmit_stopped(netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, 0))) {
 		RTL_W8(TxPoll, NPQ);
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/