Message-ID: <tip-650b7b23cb1e32d77daeefbac1ceb1329abf3b23@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 21 Feb 2015 09:46:20 -0800
From:	tip-bot for Petr Mladek <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, ananth@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...nel.org, jkosina@...e.cz, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
	pmladek@...e.cz, davem@...emloft.net,
	anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] kprobes/x86:
  Use 5-byte NOP when the code might be modified by ftrace

Commit-ID:  650b7b23cb1e32d77daeefbac1ceb1329abf3b23
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/650b7b23cb1e32d77daeefbac1ceb1329abf3b23
Author:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
AuthorDate: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:07:29 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 10:33:30 +0100

kprobes/x86: Use 5-byte NOP when the code might be modified by ftrace

can_probe() checks if the given address points to the beginning
of an instruction. It analyzes all the instructions from the
beginning of the function until the given address. The code
might be modified by another Kprobe. In this case, the current
code is read into a buffer, int3 breakpoint is replaced by the
saved opcode in the buffer, and can_probe() analyzes the buffer
instead.

There is a bug that __recover_probed_insn() tries to restore
the original code even for Kprobes using the ftrace framework.
But in this case, the opcode is not stored. See the difference
between arch_prepare_kprobe() and arch_prepare_kprobe_ftrace().
The opcode is stored by arch_copy_kprobe() only from
arch_prepare_kprobe().

This patch makes Kprobe to use the ideal 5-byte NOP when the
code can be modified by ftrace. It is the original instruction,
see ftrace_make_nop() and ftrace_nop_replace().

Note that we always need to use the NOP for ftrace locations.
Kprobes do not block ftrace and the instruction might get
modified at anytime. It might even be in an inconsistent state
because it is modified step by step using the int3 breakpoint.

The patch also fixes indentation of the touched comment.

Note that I found this problem when playing with Kprobes. I did
it on x86_64 with gcc-4.8.3 that supported -mfentry. I modified
samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c and added offset 5 to put
the probe right after the fentry area:

 static struct kprobe kp = {
 	.symbol_name	= "do_fork",
+	.offset = 5,
 };

Then I was able to load kprobe_example before jprobe_example
but not the other way around:

  $> modprobe jprobe_example
  $> modprobe kprobe_example
  modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'kprobe_example': Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide character

It did not make much sense and debugging pointed to the bug
described above.

Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Ananth NMavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1424441250-27146-2-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 6a1146e..c3b4b46 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -223,27 +223,41 @@ static unsigned long
 __recover_probed_insn(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	struct kprobe *kp;
+	unsigned long faddr;
 
 	kp = get_kprobe((void *)addr);
-	/* There is no probe, return original address */
-	if (!kp)
+	faddr = ftrace_location(addr);
+	/*
+	 * Use the current code if it is not modified by Kprobe
+	 * and it cannot be modified by ftrace.
+	 */
+	if (!kp && !faddr)
 		return addr;
 
 	/*
-	 *  Basically, kp->ainsn.insn has an original instruction.
-	 *  However, RIP-relative instruction can not do single-stepping
-	 *  at different place, __copy_instruction() tweaks the displacement of
-	 *  that instruction. In that case, we can't recover the instruction
-	 *  from the kp->ainsn.insn.
+	 * Basically, kp->ainsn.insn has an original instruction.
+	 * However, RIP-relative instruction can not do single-stepping
+	 * at different place, __copy_instruction() tweaks the displacement of
+	 * that instruction. In that case, we can't recover the instruction
+	 * from the kp->ainsn.insn.
 	 *
-	 *  On the other hand, kp->opcode has a copy of the first byte of
-	 *  the probed instruction, which is overwritten by int3. And
-	 *  the instruction at kp->addr is not modified by kprobes except
-	 *  for the first byte, we can recover the original instruction
-	 *  from it and kp->opcode.
+	 * On the other hand, in case on normal Kprobe, kp->opcode has a copy
+	 * of the first byte of the probed instruction, which is overwritten
+	 * by int3. And the instruction at kp->addr is not modified by kprobes
+	 * except for the first byte, we can recover the original instruction
+	 * from it and kp->opcode.
+	 *
+	 * In case of Kprobes using ftrace, we do not have a copy of
+	 * the original instruction. In fact, the ftrace location might
+	 * be modified at anytime and even could be in an inconsistent state.
+	 * Fortunately, we know that the original code is the ideal 5-byte
+	 * long NOP.
 	 */
-	memcpy(buf, kp->addr, MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
-	buf[0] = kp->opcode;
+	memcpy(buf, (void *)addr, MAX_INSN_SIZE * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
+	if (faddr)
+		memcpy(buf, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], 5);
+	else
+		buf[0] = kp->opcode;
 	return (unsigned long)buf;
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists