[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150221203256.GA15228@amd>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 21:32:56 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Chirantan Ekbote <chirantan@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / sleep: add configurable delay for pm_test
> Considering that Brian's change are enclosed within a CONFIG_PM_DEBUG
> ifdef, can we really use the code bloat as a technical argument here?
Yes.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists