linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] more vfs bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxOqP2Xfba2k8bGLrgM2VgjeGAThHXxLjiM2CwEeWZV2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Feb 2015 14:48:23 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] more vfs bits

On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Explain it, or that crap gets undone.

Also explain why that crap was done one file at a time?

I'm getting really tired of people trying to inflate their commit
counts with tricks like this. What was the advantage of doing the same
thing over-and-over one file at a time? It makes things more
manageable exactly *why*?

                         Linus "grumpy as hell" Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/