[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150220161132.d636e85fd4f9698d889243d2@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:11:32 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Iulia Manda <iulia.manda21@...il.com>
Cc: geert@...ux-m68k.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, peterz@...radead.org, mhocko@...e.cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, serge.hallyn@...onical.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, tim.bird@...ymobile.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] kernel: Conditionally support non-root users, groups
and capabilities
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:03:36 +0200 Iulia Manda <iulia.manda21@...il.com> wrote:
> There are a lot of embedded systems that run most or all of their functionality
> in init, running as root:root. For these systems, supporting multiple users is
> not necessary.
>
> This patch adds a new symbol, CONFIG_MULTIUSER, that makes support for non-root
> users, non-root groups, and capabilities optional. It is enabled under
> CONFIG_EXPERT menu.
>
> When this symbol is not defined, UID and GID are zero in any possible case
> and processes always have all capabilities.
>
> The following syscalls are compiled out: setuid, setregid, setgid,
> setreuid, setresuid, getresuid, setresgid, getresgid, setgroups, getgroups,
> setfsuid, setfsgid, capget, capset.
>
> Also, groups.c is compiled out completely.
>
> In kernel/capability.c, capable function was moved in order to avoid adding two
> ifdef blocks.
>
> This change saves about 25 KB on a defconfig build.
>
> The kernel was booted in Qemu. All the common functionalities work. Adding
> users/groups is not possible, failing with -ENOSYS.
>
> Bloat-o-meter output:
> add/remove: 7/87 grow/shrink: 19/397 up/down: 1675/-26325 (-24650)
The objective seems OK to me - in some kernel applications non-root
users are never needed and it's better to not force those systems to
carry a lump of code they will never use.
How significant is the 25k saving? On a realistic kernel build for
such a target, what proportion of kernel memory usage are we talking
about here?
Did you look at moving sys_setregid into groups.c (or elsewhere) to
save an ifdef?
I assume that more savings can be squeezed out - there will be fields
in the task_struct and other places which will never be used. ifdefing
those out will get messy. Have you done any investigation here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists