[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150222082228.GB22972@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 09:22:28 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86, fpu: Use eagerfpu by default on all CPUs
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> - Do you have enough RAM that there's essentially no IO
> in the system worth speaking of? Do you have enough RAM
> to copy a whole kernel tree to /tmp/linux/ and do the
> measurement there, on ramfs?
Doing that will also pin down the page cache: kernel build
times are very sensitive to the page cache layout, and once
a page cache layout is established on systems with lots of
RAM it does not tend to be flushed out. But the next bootup
will generate another random page cache layout - which
makes inter-kernel kernel build times comparisons much
noiser than the run-to-run numbers suggest.
So to get more precise measurements a 'pinned' page cache
layout and the dynamic debug switch you implemented is very
helpful and --repeat stddev will be pretty representative
of the true noise of the measurement.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists