[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150222180325.GA18233@gradator.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 19:03:25 +0100
From: Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@...secur.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] drm: atmel-hlcdc: Add PM suspend/resume support
Hello Andrzej,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:47:23AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 02/12/2015 09:49 PM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> > +static int atmel_hlcdc_dc_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > +
> > + drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, head) {
> > + struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs *crtc_funcs = crtc->helper_private;
> > + crtc_funcs->enable(crtc);
>
> What about crtc's which were disabled before suspend, they will be
> enabled here unconditionally.
Indeed, fixed in v3.
> > struct atmel_hlcdc_dc *dc = dev->dev_private;
> > @@ -488,6 +518,8 @@ static struct drm_driver atmel_hlcdc_dc_driver = {
> > .driver_features = DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ | DRIVER_GEM | DRIVER_MODESET,
> > .preclose = atmel_hlcdc_dc_preclose,
> > .lastclose = atmel_hlcdc_dc_lastclose,
> > + .suspend = atmel_hlcdc_dc_suspend,
> > + .resume = atmel_hlcdc_dc_resume,
>
> These callbacks are obsolete and should not be used, additionally core
> don't call them if drm_device have DRIVER_MODESET flag.
Oh!, that might explain the struggle I had understanding when they were
actually called. Removed in v3.
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > +static int atmel_hlcdc_dc_drm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + pm_message_t message;
> > +
> > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev) || !drm_dev)
>
> Nitpick, !drm_dev is always false, is not?
I guess so, platform_set_drvdata() is called during probe so it can't be
null here. Removed in v3.
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + message.event = PM_EVENT_SUSPEND;
> > + return atmel_hlcdc_dc_suspend(drm_dev, message);
>
> If you remove obsolete callbacks you can move suspend code here,
> the same for resume.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int atmel_hlcdc_dc_drm_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev) || !drm_dev)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return atmel_hlcdc_dc_resume(drm_dev);
>
> Ditto x2
Indeed, merged in v3.
Thank you very much for this review ! :)
Sylvain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists