[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUWZy+E4RoFRQjkV9he9iqv_1sjWcTdLbMLgw1nqRDxbPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:02:20 +0100
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-v3.19-9526-ga135c717d5cd + vfs.git] blk_update_request:
I/O error, dev loop0
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com> wrote:
> On 02/22/2015 06:09 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when testing Linux-next (upcoming v3.20) I fell over similiar messages
>> when running fio here.
>>
>> This commit helped which is now upstream [1]...
>>
>> commit 9f9ee1f2b2f94f19437ae2def7c0d6636d7fe02e
>> "block: Quiesce zeroout wrapper"
>>
>> --- dmesg_3.19.0-9526.2-iniza-small_before-fio-2.2.5.txt
>> 2015-02-22 14:09:35.411824880 +0100
>> +++ dmesg_3.19.0-9526.2-iniza-small_after-fio-2.2.5.txt 2015-02-22
>> 14:10:25.327824500 +0100
>> @@ -853,3 +853,25 @@
>> [ 428.226000] Adding 36k swap on swapfile29. Priority:-29 extents:1
>> across:36k FS
>> [ 469.339645] Process 7691(waitpid02) has RLIMIT_CORE set to 1
>> [ 469.339650] Aborting core
>> +[ 1877.189057] fio-testcase.sh (10238): drop_caches: 3
>> +[ 1882.250174] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 2883712
>> +[ 1882.807993] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 32460632
>> +[ 1884.655458] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 16869712
>> +[ 1884.656896] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 16854368
>> +[ 1884.659316] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 16855008
>> +[ 1884.660834] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 16869792
>> +[ 1884.661780] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 16854848
>> +[ 1884.663282] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 16855432
>> +[ 1884.664775] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 16859808
>> +[ 1884.671472] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 16866400
>> +[ 1892.239383] blk_update_request: 20 callbacks suppressed
>> +[ 1892.239389] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 7872768
>> +[ 1897.221576] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 23331008
>> +[ 1898.299271] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 25690688
>> +[ 1898.444161] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 25726496
>> +[ 1898.445946] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 25690832
>> +[ 1898.448185] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 25692312
>> +[ 1898.449321] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 25704840
>> +[ 1898.450314] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 25710392
>> +[ 1898.451351] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 25726080
>> +[ 1898.452348] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop0, sector 25737608
>>
>> FYI: This is with Linux-v3.19-9526-ga135c717d5cd plus vfs.git#for-linus.
>
>
> This really has nothing to do with commit 9f9ee1f2b2f, other than that they
> both have some block related messages. The above is normal IO errors on the
> device, we expect to see messages related to that. The question is mostly
> why you are seeing those. What are you running on the device?
>
> And is this a regression since 3.19?
>
OK, I mixed it up - I was on a hurry travelling back home.
This is (still) a Ubuntu/precise AMD64 WUBI system where I did the
block-loopmq testing.
It seems to be a regression since 3.19 (see my attached tarball).
- Sedat -
Download attachment "for-axboe-2.tar.gz" of type "application/x-gzip" (63191 bytes)
Download attachment "for-axboe-2.tar.gz.sha256sum" of type "application/octet-stream" (85 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists