[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wq3a31rf.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 15:21:08 +0900
From: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] h8300: Process and signal
At Sat, 21 Feb 2015 09:51:23 +0000,
Al Viro wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 04:53:49PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
>
> > +static inline void *
> > +get_sigframe(struct k_sigaction *ka, struct pt_regs *regs, size_t frame_size)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long usp;
> > +
> > + /* Default to using normal stack. */
> > + usp = rdusp();
> > +
> > + /* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching. */
> > + if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
> > + if (!sas_ss_flags(usp))
> > + usp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
> > + }
>
> Use sigsp(), please. Pass ksig to that sucker and it'll become
> return (void *)((sigsp(rdusp, ksig) - frame_size) & -8UL);
OK.
>
> > +static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > + * We want the common case to go fast, which
> > + * is why we may in certain cases get here from
> > + * kernel mode. Just return without doing anything
> > + * if so.
> > + */
> > + if ((regs->ccr & 0x10))
> > + return;
>
> Can we get there in kernel mode, actually?
It case checking for entry.S
Removed.
Thanks.
--
Yoshinori Sato
<ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists