linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: max98088: Add master clock handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:23:21 +0100
From:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Tushar Behera <trblinux@...il.com>,
	Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
CC:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: max98088: Add master clock handling

Hi,

Am 23.02.2015 um 09:29 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> On 02/20/2015 04:27 AM, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> On 02/20/2015 12:48 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> If master clock is provided through device tree, then update
>>> the master clock frequency during set_sysclk.
>>>
>>> Cc: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>>> ---
>>>  sound/soc/codecs/max98088.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>
>>
>> Looks good.
>>
>> Acked-by: Tushar Behera <trblinux@...il.com>
>>
> 
> Looks good to me as well.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>

Thanks guys. One self-doubt: Is there any downside to returning
-EPROBE_DEFER after regcache_mark_dirty(max98088->regmap)? I.e., should
I move the last hunk some lines up to be the very first thing executed?

Cheers,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/