[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1424703170.20944.26.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:52:50 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/27] regulator: dbx500: Remove use of
seq_puts/seq_printf return value
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 22:55 +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 06:53:54PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > The seq_puts/seq_printf return value, because it's frequently misused,
> > will eventually be converted to void.
>
> I'm missing both the cover letter and the previous 26 patches - are
> there any dependencies?
The cover letter was sent only to mailing lists because
adding all the various maintainers to the cover letter
would cause mailing list bounces.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/21/221
No dependencies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists