[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150223165659.GD32181@mail.hallyn.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:56:59 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nathan Scott <nathans@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH v10 1/2] /proc/PID/status: show all sets of pid
according to ns
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:48:04PM +0800, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
> If some issues occurred inside a container guest, host user
> could not know which process is in trouble just by guest pid:
> the users of container guest only knew the pid inside containers.
> This will bring obstacle for trouble shooting.
>
> This patch adds four fields: NStgid, NSpid, NSpgid and NSsid:
> a) In init_pid_ns, nothing changed;
>
> b) In one pidns, will tell the pid inside containers:
> NStgid: 21776 5 1
> NSpid: 21776 5 1
> NSpgid: 21776 5 1
> NSsid: 21729 1 0
> ** Process id is 21776 in level 0, 5 in level 1, 1 in level 2.
>
> c) If pidns is nested, it depends on which pidns are you in.
> NStgid: 5 1
> NSpid: 5 1
> NSpgid: 5 1
> NSsid: 1 0
> ** Views from level 1
So obviously (since I acked it) I see no problems with this patch or
the api, but it occurs to me that you have not cc:d linux-api? Since
a procfile addition is something we're stuck with for eternity, it
seems worth it. If we get an ack from there, then i'd say email
to Linus directly. Putting this through -mm doesn't really seem
necessary given its nature.
> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>
> Tested-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
> Tested-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@...hat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> v10: remove trailing space of pid numbers
> rebased on 3.19
> v9: rebased on 3.19-rc1
> No change from v4-v8
> v3: add another two fielsd: NSpgid and NSsid.
> v2: add two new fields: NStgid and NSpid.
> keep fields of Tgid and Pid unchanged for back compatibility.
>
> fs/proc/array.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
> index 1295a00..d79bad9 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> @@ -188,6 +188,22 @@ static inline void task_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> from_kgid_munged(user_ns, GROUP_AT(group_info, g)));
> put_cred(cred);
>
> + seq_puts(m, "\nNStgid:");
> + for (g = ns->level; g <= pid->level; g++)
> + seq_printf(m, "\t%d",
> + task_tgid_nr_ns(p, pid->numbers[g].ns));
> + seq_puts(m, "\nNSpid:");
> + for (g = ns->level; g <= pid->level; g++)
> + seq_printf(m, "\t%d",
> + task_pid_nr_ns(p, pid->numbers[g].ns));
> + seq_puts(m, "\nNSpgid:");
> + for (g = ns->level; g <= pid->level; g++)
> + seq_printf(m, "\t%d",
> + task_pgrp_nr_ns(p, pid->numbers[g].ns));
> + seq_puts(m, "\nNSsid:");
> + for (g = ns->level; g <= pid->level; g++)
> + seq_printf(m, "\t%d",
> + task_session_nr_ns(p, pid->numbers[g].ns));
> seq_putc(m, '\n');
> }
>
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists