[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150223172050.GB16699@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:20:50 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Adrien Schildknecht <adrien+dev@...ischi.me>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
srostedt@...hat.com, luto@...capital.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: use kstack_end() in dumpstack_64.c
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:17:51PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I'm curious to what the dependency is? What would break if we apply
> this without that patch?
Nah, no dependency - it causes just a little fuzz when the previous one
is missing.
I'll apply it to the proper tree and fixup the commit message :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists