[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150223180326.GC5116@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:03:27 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] groups: integer underflow in groups_alloc()
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:10:02AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> writes:
>
> > This is called from rsc_parse() with a use controlled value. Say for
> > example that "gidsetsize" is negative, then we could end up allocating
> > less than sizeof(struct group_info) leading to memory corruption.
>
> Right now it is the responsibility of the caller of groups_alloc to make
> certain that gidsetsize is a valid value, and the callers of
> groups_alloc who know what they are doing already validate this value.
>
> Either the pattern of caller validates the messages needs to continue,
> or groups_alloc needs to be changed and all of the callers need to be
> updated.
>
> Changing groups_alloc for one particular caller is just going to cause
> maintenance problems.
>
This only affects NFS so let's hear from them if this limit is correct
and decide from there.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists