[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54EB73DC.4090507@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:39:24 -0500
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Matt Porter <matt.porter@...aro.org>,
Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm: am33xx: DT quirks for am33xx based beaglebone
variants
Hi Pantelis,
On 02/19/2015 01:44 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 20:36 , Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
>>
>> * Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com> [150219 10:32]:
>>>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 20:16 , Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Uhh I don't like the idea of duplicating the i2c-omap.c driver under
>>>> arch/arm.. And in general we should initialize things later rather
>>>> than earlier.
>>>>
>>>> What's stopping doing these quirk checks later on time with just
>>>> a regular device driver, something like drivers/misc/bbone-quirks.c?
>>>>
>>>
>>> We have no choice; we are way early in the boot process, right after
>>> the device tree unflattening step.
>>
>> To me it seems the dt patching part should be done with minimal
>> code before any driver like features..
>>
>
> The way it’s done right now is with minimal code. Reading the EEPROM
> is required.
>
>>> I’ve toyed with the idea of using early platform devices but the omap-i2c driver
>>> would need some tender love and care to make it work, and I didn’t want to get
>>> bogged down with i2c driver details at this point.
>>
>> ..so how about just parse a kernel cmdline for the quirks to apply
>> based on a version string or similar? That can be easily populated
>> by u-boot or set manually with setenv.
>>
>> That leaves out the need for tinkering with i2c super early in
>> the kernel for revision detection.
>>
>
> You assume there’s going to be a bootloader…
So does this patch.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/am33xx-dt-quirks.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/am33xx-dt-quirks.c
[...]
> + * Note that we rely on the bootloader setting up the muxes
> + * (which is the case for u-boot).
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists