[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150223184052.GA21067@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:40:52 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86, fpu: Use eagerfpu by default on all CPUs
On 02/23, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/23/2015 10:11 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:59:29PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >> Well, but if we want this change then perhaps we should simply
> >> change the default value? This way "AUTO" still can work.
> >
> > Yeah, sure, let's do some measurements first, to see whether this
> > is even worth it.
> >
> > Btw, Mel pointed me at some cleanups he did a while ago in that
> > area too: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/6/201
> >
> > If you guys could take a look, that would be awesome :)
>
> I don't think any of those changes would survive the
> "defer FPU loading to do_notify_resume" patch series.
Agreed, at least
+static inline void switch_eagerfpu_prepare(struct task_struct *old, struct task_struct *new, int cpu,
+ fpu_switch_t *fpu)
+{
+ fpu->preload = tsk_used_math(new);
doesn't look right if we change the rules.
OTOH, perhaps it makes sense to redo these cleanups later.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists