[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150223111621.bc73004f51af2ca8e2847944@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:16:21 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Ebru Akagunduz <ebru.akagunduz@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kirill@...temov.name, mhocko@...e.cz, mgorman@...e.de,
rientjes@...gle.com, sasha.levin@...cle.com, hughd@...gle.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, vbabka@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, keithr@...m.mit.edu, dvyukov@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: incorporate zero pages into transparent huge
pages
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 19:08:12 -0500 Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/18/2015 06:31 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:03:55 +0200 Ebru Akagunduz
> > <ebru.akagunduz@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This patch improves THP collapse rates, by allowing zero pages.
> >>
> >> Currently THP can collapse 4kB pages into a THP when there are up
> >> to khugepaged_max_ptes_none pte_none ptes in a 2MB range. This
> >> patch counts pte none and mapped zero pages with the same
> >> variable.
> >
> > So if I'm understanding this correctly, with the default value of
> > khugepaged_max_ptes_none (HPAGE_PMD_NR-1), if an application
> > creates a 2MB area which contains 511 mappings of the zero page and
> > one real page, the kernel will proceed to turn that area into a
> > real, physical huge page. So it consumes 2MB of memory which would
> > not have previously been allocated?
>
> This is equivalent to an application doing a write fault
> to a 2MB area that was previously untouched, going into
> do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() and receiving a 2MB page.
>
> > If so, this might be rather undesirable behaviour in some
> > situations (and ditto the current behaviour for pte_none ptes)?
> >
> > This can be tuned by adjusting khugepaged_max_ptes_none,
>
> The example of directly going into do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page()
> is not influenced by the tunable.
>
> It may indeed be undesirable in some situations, but I am
> not sure how to detect those...
Here's a live one: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93111
Application does MADV_DONTNEED to free up a load of memory and then
khugepaged comes along and pages that memory back in again. It seems a
bit silly to do this after userspace has deliberately discarded those
pages!
Presumably MADV_NOHUGEPAGE can be used to prevent this, but it's a bit
of a hand-grenade. I guess the MADV_DONTNEED manpage should be updated
to explain all this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists