linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] /proc/PID/status: show all sets of pid according to ns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:00:09 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
	Nathan Scott <nathans@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] /proc/PID/status: show all sets of pid
 according to ns

On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:45:49 +0800 Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> If some issues occurred inside a container guest, host user
> could not know which process is in trouble just by guest pid:
> the users of container guest only knew the pid inside containers.
> This will bring obstacle for trouble shooting.
> 
> This patch adds four fields: NStgid, NSpid, NSpgid and NSsid:
> a) In init_pid_ns, nothing changed;
> 
> b) In one pidns, will tell the pid inside containers:
>   NStgid: 21776   5       1
>   NSpid:  21776   5       1
>   NSpgid: 21776   5       1
>   NSsid:  21729   1       0
>   ** Process id is 21776 in level 0, 5 in level 1, 1 in level 2.
> 
> c) If pidns is nested, it depends on which pidns are you in.
>   NStgid: 5       1
>   NSpid:  5       1
>   NSpgid: 5       1
>   NSsid:  1       0
>   ** Views from level 1
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> @@ -208,6 +208,22 @@ static inline void task_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
>  			   from_kgid_munged(user_ns, GROUP_AT(group_info, g)));
>  	put_cred(cred);
>  
> +	seq_puts(m, "\nNStgid:");
> +	for (g = ns->level; g <= pid->level; g++)
> +		seq_printf(m, "\t%d",
> +			task_tgid_nr_ns(p, pid->numbers[g].ns));
> +	seq_puts(m, "\nNSpid:");
> +	for (g = ns->level; g <= pid->level; g++)
> +		seq_printf(m, "\t%d",
> +			task_pid_nr_ns(p, pid->numbers[g].ns));
> +	seq_puts(m, "\nNSpgid:");
> +	for (g = ns->level; g <= pid->level; g++)
> +		seq_printf(m, "\t%d",
> +			task_pgrp_nr_ns(p, pid->numbers[g].ns));
> +	seq_puts(m, "\nNSsid:");
> +	for (g = ns->level; g <= pid->level; g++)
> +		seq_printf(m, "\t%d",
> +			task_session_nr_ns(p, pid->numbers[g].ns));
>  	seq_putc(m, '\n');
>  }

Is there any point in including this code if CONFIG_USER_NS=n?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/