[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150223221538.GA25109@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:15:38 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: fs: dax: do not build on ARC or SH
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 01:58:47PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 01:56:34PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Guess there a philosophical difference in opinion if the architecture code
> > should (have to) provide copy_user_page() or not outside the architecture
> > code itself. After all, fs/dax.c _is_ the only user of this function outside
> > the architecture code.
>
> Given that copy_user_page just is an optimized version of copy_page
> all these architectures should just grab the trivial macro defintion
> from the asm-generic version so that we could avoid this discussion.
>
I tried to do just that, for mips, with little success.
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9175/
Presumably, if copy_page() followed by a conditional flush_data_cache_page()
does not work on mips, I would assume that copy_page() without flush does not
work either.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists