[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150223.171947.1925831716804927748.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:19:47 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add EEE support
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:26:09 -0800
> + /* Don't call phy_init_eee for now. It fails if the link is down,
> + * but that should not really be a reason to fail configuration.
> + */
I think there is some confusion about phy_init_eee().
You invoke it after a link has been established. Because programming
the MDIO registers that turn on EEE can only be done if the link
is configured in a certain way.
If you look at stmmac, it invokes phy_init_eee() via it's adjust_link
callback passed to phy_connect(). This is basically how I would
expect it to be used, in that any time a link parameter changes we
rerun phy_init_eee() to check the link partner registers, duplex
state, etc.
SXGBE on the other hand seems to not be using phy_init_eee() properly,
it only invokes it once per device open and that makes no sense at all
because then you're stuck with the eee state resulting from the link
state at open time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists