[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150224034548.GC18140@ld-irv-0074>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:45:48 -0800
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas@...e-electrons.com>,
Seif Mazareeb <seif@...vell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sudhakar Gundubogula <sudhakar@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: nand: pxa3xx: Fix PIO FIFO draining
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:16:43PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On 02/17/2015 02:07 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> > It will be Brian choice eventually, but if you say that you will submit that
> > approach for next cycle, and yours for stable, and that for next you'll convert
> > mdelay() to msleep(), I'll stop arguing.
>
> How about you push a proper patchset with this alternative (and a nice
> cover letter explaining the need for a threaded irq) so we can discuss
> properly this new turn?
I think both Maxime's change (polling a new HW bit) and Robert J's
change (move to a threaded IRQ) are good. I'll take another look, but I
expect I'll take Maxime's v4 for the 4.0 cycle, and Robert J's v2 for
4.1 (or will we just jump straight to 5.0? I never know). Will I see a
patch to convert to msleep() and/or a jiffies timeout in the near
future?
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists