[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1796599.ux1YsIdsDy@avalon>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 02:23:26 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] media: omap3isp: ispvideo: use vb2_fop_mmap/poll
Hi Prabhakar,
Thank you for the patch.
On Monday 23 February 2015 20:19:33 Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>
> No need to reinvent the wheel. Just use the already existing
> functions provided v4l-core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispvideo.c | 30 ++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispvideo.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispvideo.c index b648176..5dd5ffc 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispvideo.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispvideo.c
> @@ -1277,37 +1277,13 @@ static int isp_video_release(struct file *file)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int isp_video_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> -{
> - struct isp_video *video = video_drvdata(file);
> - int ret;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&video->queue_lock);
> - ret = vb2_poll(&video->queue, file, wait);
> - mutex_unlock(&video->queue_lock);
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
This depends on patch 2/3, which can't be accepted as-is for now.
> -static int isp_video_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> -{
> - struct isp_video *video = video_drvdata(file);
> - int ret;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&video->queue_lock);
> - ret = vb2_mmap(&video->queue, vma);
> - mutex_unlock(&video->queue_lock);
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
This should be good but has the side effect of removing locking in
isp_video_mmap(). Now, I think that's the right thing to do, but it should be
done in a separate patch first with a proper explanation. I can do so, or you
can submit an additional patch.
> static struct v4l2_file_operations isp_video_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .unlocked_ioctl = video_ioctl2,
> .open = isp_video_open,
> .release = isp_video_release,
> - .poll = isp_video_poll,
> - .mmap = isp_video_mmap,
> + .poll = vb2_fop_poll,
> + .mmap = vb2_fop_mmap,
> };
>
> /* ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> @@ -1389,6 +1365,8 @@ int omap3isp_video_register(struct isp_video
> *video, struct v4l2_device *vdev)
>
> video->video.v4l2_dev = vdev;
>
> + /* queue isnt initalized */
> + video->video.queue = &video->queue;
> ret = video_register_device(&video->video, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> if (ret < 0)
> dev_err(video->isp->dev,
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists