linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 27/27] regulator: dbx500: Remove use of seq_puts/seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150224081815.GT6236@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:18:15 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/27] regulator: dbx500: Remove use of
 seq_puts/seq_printf return value

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 06:52:50AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:

> The cover letter was sent only to mailing lists because
> adding all the various maintainers to the cover letter
> would cause mailing list bounces.

> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/21/221

> No dependencies.

OK, I've applied it.  If you're doing something like this where your
"series" doesn't actually have any dependencies it's probably better to
just send a lot of individual patches, that's much easier to understand
and handle than just getting one odd patch in the middle of a series and
means things are less likely to get snarled up by process as a result.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)