lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150224084049.GH24441@norris-Latitude-E6410>
Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:40:49 -0800
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
Cc:	Rodrigo Freire <rfreire@...hat.com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, Herton Krzesinski <hkrzesin@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: block2mtd: Removes PAGE_MASK as a index to
 partition size

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:30:21PM +1300, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2015-02-24 21:27, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:20:31PM +1300, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> >> On 2015-02-24 21:07, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> > OK let's drop this patch from the series. At best, we could just do
> >> > something like this instead:
> >> > 
> >> > -	dev->mtd.size = dev->blkdev->bd_inode->i_size & PAGE_MASK;
> >> > +	dev->mtd.size = dev->blkdev->bd_inode->i_size;
> >> > 
> >> > But that's really just an unnecessary change.
> >> If I remember correctly, it was problematic to have a dev->mtd.size
> >> value which is not a multiple of the erase size. I think that was the
> >> reason for patch 3.
> > 
> > The what's this for?
> > 
> > 	if ((long)dev->blkdev->bd_inode->i_size % erase_size) {
> > 		pr_err("erasesize must be a divisor of device size\n");
> > 		goto err_free_block2mtd;
> > 	}
> I think we should just trim the mtd size to a multiple of erase size and
> remove this check. It is a bit impractical for many cases.

Well that's not the subject of anything in this series, and this patch
does not stand alone well, so I'm not taking it. Feel free to send a
different patch if you have good reason to.

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ