[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54EC45EC.3020205@linn.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:35:40 +0000
From: Stathis Voukelatos <stathis.voukelatos@...n.co.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] Packet sniffer core framework
On 23/02/15 21:37, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stathis Voukelatos <stathis.voukelatos@...n.co.uk>
> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:26:21 +0000
>
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>> + /* Stop the hardware */
>> + sch->stop(sch);
>> + /* Set the new command pattern */
>> + ret = sch->set_pattern(sch, skb->data, skb->len / 2);
>> + /* Restart the hardware */
>> + sch->start(sch);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>
> These comments are excessive.
>
> When someone calls ops->stop() what are they supposed to think the
> thing does? Open a can of tuna? Mow the lawn? Wash the dishes? No,
> it stops the thing. Everyone understands that and you don't have to
> explicitly say it.
>
> Saying "stop the hardware" does not add anything to the source code
> that is not already implicitly there. They just take up space and
> keep more useful information from being displayed at once on the
> screen. Please remove all of these things.
>
> Thanks.
>
Will remove the comments in the next version of the patch set.
Thank you,
Stathis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists