[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150224141644.GA18301@katana>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:16:44 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/11] i2c: add quirk checks to core
> > + if (msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD) {
> > + if (i2c_quirk_exceeded(len, max_read))
> > + return i2c_quirk_error(adap, &msgs[i], "msg too long");
> > + } else {
> > + if (i2c_quirk_exceeded(len, max_write))
> > + return i2c_quirk_error(adap, &msgs[i], "msg too long");
> > + }
>
> What about being more verbose in the error message, specifying if it
> was a read or a write message that failed?
Yes, done now. Thanks!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists