[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1502240956400.29006@gentwo.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:58:13 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Aaron Jones <aaronmdjones@...il.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
Markku Savela <msa@...h.iki.fi>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> The other way to look at it then is that it's basically as though the
> privileged task (which has CAP_SETFCAP) could've just added fI=full to
> all binaries on the filesystem; instead it's using the ambient set
> so that the risk from fI=full is contained to its own process tree.
The way that our internal patch works is to leave these things alone and
just check the ambient mask in the *capable*() functions. That way the
behavior of the existing cap bits does not change but the ambient caps
stay available. Apps have no surprises.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists