linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/13] x86/microcode/intel: Fix printing of microcode blobs in show_saved

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:24:27 +0100
From:	Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] x86/microcode/intel: Fix printing of microcode
 blobs in show_saved_mc()

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:37:12AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> 
> While at it, make pr_* stuff use "microcode: " prefix for easier
> grepping and document how to enable the DEBUG build.
> 
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,14 @@
>   *	as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
>   *	2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>   */
> +
> +/*
> + * This needs to be before all headers so that pr_debug in printk.h doesn't turn
> + * printk calls into no_printk().
> + *
> + *#define DEBUG
> + */
> +

Hmm I might be completely wrong but I thought the whole point of pr_debug()
was to have something dynamic at runtime as opposed to compiled in?  What
am I missing?

Quentin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/