[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F329EBC73@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:47:23 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] x86: mce: kdump: use under_crashdumping to turn off
MCE in all CPUs together
> If that is the case, the tolerance level might be the better approach
> after all...
We should also take a look at mce_start():
int cpus = num_online_cpus();
...
/*
* Wait for everyone.
*/
while (atomic_read(&mce_callin) != cpus) {
since offline cpus will still show up to rendezvous ... perhaps "num_present_cpus()"
is the right number??
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists