[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150224192238.GA9758@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:22:38 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
matt.fleming@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86: use correct early_[mem,io][re,un]map pairs
On Tue, 24 Feb, at 10:13:27AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Areas mapped via early_memremap() should be unmapped via
> early_memunmap(), while I/O-areas should be mapped via early_ioremap()
> and unmapped via early_iounmap().
>
> There are multiple spots where an area is mapped via the mem variant
> and unmapped via the io variant. This series corrects this by using
> the appropriate variants.
>
> Juergen Gross (4):
> x86: use early_memunmap in arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
> x86: use early_memunmap in arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> x86: use early_memunmap in arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> x86, efi: use early_ioremap in arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c
>
> arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++++----
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Whole series looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists