[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8Xd+-+zGz8R2H2t1Smp0erN7NtwDLbxAWshRz_FjU2T8CnEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:00:31 -0300
From: Gustavo Bittencourt <gbitten@...il.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.18.7-rt2
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Mike Galbraith
<umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 13:19 -0300, Gustavo Bittencourt wrote:
>>
>> The deadlock returned after I applied this patch in v3.18.7-rt2. Here is my log:
>
>
> Hrmph. I definitely want your patch to die ;-) It adds a whole new
> dimension to ww_mutex that only now exists in -rt. That's not good.
No problem.
> My
> patchlet may not be perfect either, but it lets ww_mutex do that return
> EALREADY business it's supposed to, vs going straight to while(1). We
> can't have it both ways, so I suppose I'll fire up my old Q6600 box
> (that doesn't have annoying GTX980 that my userspace can't deal with DRM
> wise), and see if I can chase the nouveau thing down. I'm not all that
> enthusiastic though, as there are or at least were other issues with
> nouveau. Sebastian reported some completely _missing_ locking IIRC,
> that led to his box exploding.
Is there anyway that I could help? I think I can write a code to
reproduce the deadlock without the nouveau driver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists