[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150224162339.36670d94@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:23:39 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jörn Engel <joern@...estorage.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push
migration instead of pulling
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:39:46 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> @@ -1775,6 +1946,15 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_
> */
> smp_rmb();
>
> + /* Use local just in case a feature is switched in the middle of this */
> + if ((use_ipi = sched_feat(RT_PUSH_IPI))) {
> + /* Make sure the update to pending is visible here. */
> + smp_rmb();
While porting this to the -rt kernel, I noticed that this rmb is
unneeded. It's already called above for a different reason :-p
-- Steve
> +
> + /* If a push ipi is out, then we must do the old method */
> + push_pending = READ_ONCE(this_rq->rt.push_csd_pending);
> + }
> +
> for_each_cpu(cpu, this_rq->rd->rto_mask) {
> if (this_cpu == cpu)
> continue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists