| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1424814530.6833.11.camel@theros.lm.intel.com> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:48:50 -0700 From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, hpa@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm: Add support for the pcommit instruction On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 13:41 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/24/2015 01:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > On 02/24/2015 01:30 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:14:01PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>> That may cause the same line to be flushed twice. I would suggest, > >>> instead, also removing the arithmetic on void *: > >> > >> Btw, should we hold down all those suggested usages somewhere in > >> Documentation/x86/ as commit messages are generally harder to find? > >> > > > > Yes, and commit messages can't be corrected after the fact. > > > > Either that, or perhaps even better in kerneldoc comments in the source > itself. Either sounds like a good idea to me. :) Let me know which you'd prefer and I'll get something written up. - Ross -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists