[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54ECF309.3020509@ezchip.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:54:17 -0500
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
<benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <deller@....de>,
"dingtianhong@...wei.com" <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
<heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>, <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
"lizefan@...wei.com" <lizefan@...wei.com>, <paulus@...ba.org>,
<ralf@...ux-mips.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compat: Fix endian issue in union sigval
On 2/14/2015 6:22 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> 1. user populates sival_int compat_sigevent and invokes
> compat_sys_mq_notify()
> 2. kernel get_compat_sigevent() copies compat_sigevent into the native
> sigevent. compat and native sival_int are the same, no problem so
> far. The other half of 64-bit sival_ptr is zeroed by a memset in this
> function (this other half can be top or bottom, depending on
> endianness)
> 3. signal is about to be delivered to user via arch code. The
> compat_ptr(from->si_ptr) conversion always takes the least
> significant part of the native si_ptr. On big endian 64-bit, this is
> zero because get_compat_sigevent() populated the top part of si_ptr
> with si_int.
>
> So delivering such signals to compat user always sets si_int to 0.
> Little endian is fine.
I looked at this again as I was getting ready to do a tile patch, and realized
why tile and arm64 are different here: tile does a field-by-field copy in
copy_siginfo_from_user32(), like parisc and s390. As a result, we initialize
the 64-bit kernel si_ptr value by cast from the 32-bit user si_ptr value, rather
than blindly writing into the lower-addressed half of the 64-bit sigval.
As a result, I think I will leave the existing code alone, though unfortunately
that leaves it somewhat unique in manipulating the si_ptr field directly.
But I think the s390 and parisc copy_siginfo_from_user32 leave the high
bits of si_ptr uninitialized, which also strikes me as a bad idea in general.
--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists