lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8761asni74.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:42:39 +0900
From:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To:	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
Cc:	Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/fat: calculate checksum in a loop instead of directly calculating

Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de> writes:

> You have to put
> __attribute__((optimize("unroll-loops")))
> here to unroll the loop inside the function:
>
>
> static __attribute__ ((noinline))
> __attribute__((optimize("unroll-loops")))
> int test(unsigned char *name)
>
> $ time ./c.inline aaaaaaaaaaa
> 14
>
> real    0m0.743s
> user    0m0.740s
> sys     0m0.000s
>
> Without __attribute__((optimize("unroll-loops"))) :
> $ time ./c.loop aaaaaaaaaaa
> 14
>
> real    0m1.482s
> user    0m1.472s
> sys     0m0.004s
>
> With __attribute__((optimize("unroll-loops"))) :
>
> $ time ./c.loop aaaaaaaaaaa
> 14
>
> real    0m0.742s
> user    0m0.740s
> sys     0m0.000s

This attribute has to be added to the caller, not fat_checksum()?  I.e.,
we has to add it to all callers of fat_checksum()?

Well, this is interesting gcc optimize option though, maybe not worth to
introduce this to kernel only for fatfs.

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ