lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:23:54 -0500
From:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 055/152] x86_64, switch_to(): Load TLS descriptors
 before switching DS and ES

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Denys Vlasenko
<vda.linux@...glemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>>> This currently fails in 32-bit kernels (at least in qemu):
>>>
>>> / # ./es_test
>>> Allocated GDT index 7
>>> [FAIL]    ES changed from 0x3b to 0x7b
>>> [FAIL]    ES was corrupted 1000/1000 times
>>> / # uname -a
>>> Linux (none) 4.0.0-rc1 #1 SMP Tue Feb 24 16:41:58 CET 2015 i686 GNU/Linux
>>
>> Want to send a patch?  I'll get it in a few days if no one beats me.
>
> I have no patch, sorry (in fact, I failed to find where is the relevant
> 32-bit counterpart).
>
> It's just security people asked me to backport this and I wondered
> maybe I should wait a bit on this one, since fix for 32-bit ought
> to appear as well.

For 32-bit kernel, userspace DS and ES are saved at syscall/interrupt
entry time and reloaded on exit, unlike in 64-bit where they are saved
and loaded at context switch time.  Therefore 32-bit is not affected
by the issue this patch addresses.

It looks to me though, that the ES test program doesn't actually test
what the patch fixes - the segment attributes, like the base address.
It tests just the selector, which shouldn't change across a kernel
entry (with a few exceptions, like signals).  If the test is failing,
then it is a different issue from what this patch addresses.

--
Brian Gerst
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ