[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5948977.qlhSVy9R5i@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:51:57 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
eddie.huang@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alan.cheng@...iatek.com, maoguang.meng@...iatek.com,
toby.liu@...iatek.com, Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
dandan.he@...iatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: mediatek: Add config option for mt8173.
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:07:22 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
> > From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@...iatek.com>
> >
> > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC,
> > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
> > Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > index e627ead..6213dac 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > @@ -151,9 +151,15 @@ menu "Platform selection"
> > config ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx ARMv8 SoC"
> > select ARM_GIC
> > + select PINCTRL
> > help
> > Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx ARMv8 SoCs
> >
> > +config MACH_MT8173
> > + bool "Mediatek 8173 Soc Supprt"
> > + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > + default y
> > +
> > config ARCH_SEATTLE
> > bool "AMD Seattle SoC Family"
> > help
>
> Hi Arnd/Matthias,
>
> Any comments on this patch?
Hi Joe,
Actually I just commented on a similar patch from Samsung the other
day, and I think we should make a more general decision about these:
I would rather see only one Kconfig option per SoC family and use
ARCH_MEDIATEK without any MACH_* options. We can have other options
for e.g. networking chips from Mediatek that are not closely related
but I would group all the phone and tablet chips under one option
here. Same for the other vendors of course.
Any other opinions?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists