[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM4voakf6oeSEdtGtHRzQ-tC6XMbsU+VNtBnqeed8J4btKA3Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:39:06 +0530
From: Abhilash Kesavan <kesavan.abhilash@...il.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Amit Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>, inki.dae@...sung.com,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] thermal: exynos: Fix wrong control of power down
detection mode for Exynos7
Hi Lukasz,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com> wrote:
> Hi Abhilash,
>
>> This patch fixes the wrong control of PD_DET_EN (power down detection
>> mode) for Exynos7 because exynos7_tmu_control() always enables the
>> power down detection mode regardless 'on' parameter.
>>
>> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
>> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c index 933cd80..a60f527 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> @@ -682,6 +682,7 @@ static void exynos7_tmu_control(struct
>> platform_device *pdev, bool on)
>> if (on) {
>> con |= (1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
>> + con |= (1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
>> interrupt_en =
>> (of_thermal_is_trip_valid(tz, 7)
>> << EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE7_SHIFT) |
>> @@ -704,9 +705,9 @@ static void exynos7_tmu_control(struct
>> platform_device *pdev, bool on) interrupt_en <<
>> EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_FALL0_SHIFT; } else {
>> con &= ~(1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
>> + con &= ~(1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
>> interrupt_en = 0; /* Disable all interrupts */
>> }
>> - con |= 1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT;
>>
>> writel(interrupt_en, data->base + EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTEN);
>> writel(con, data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL);
>
> Could you test this patch if it isn't introducing any regression on your
> HW?
The patch does not cause any regression on exynos7 and seems logically correct.
Tested-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@...sung.com>
Regards,
Abhilash
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Lukasz Majewski
>
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists