[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150225121610.GA12377@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:16:11 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@....fi>
Cc: Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Asias He <asias.hejun@...il.com>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Ronald Minnich <rminnich@...gle.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: stand-alone kvmtool
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:23:58PM +0000, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Pekka,
Sorry for the delay, I've been away from email for a few days.
> On 2/18/15 5:50 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Thanks for doing this. Since it looks unlikely that kvmtool will ever be
> > merged back into the kernel tree, it makes sense to cut the dependency
> > in my opinion.
>
> I am certainly OK with a standalone repository which preserves the
> history. Will, would you like to take over the proposed new repository
> and put it somewhere on git.kernel.org, perhaps?
Sure thing. I'll sync-up with Andre and reply back here when we've got
something sensible.
One extra point that I don't think has been mentioned in this thread so
far is that separating kvmtool from the kernel sources is likely a
prerequisite for distribution packaging. Once we've got something sorted
out, I'll poke some friendly local debian developers and see if they can't
package it up for us.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists