[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.11.1502251459001.14861@localhost>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:01:08 +0000 (UTC)
From: Scot Doyle <lkml14@...tdoyle.com>
To: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ACPI / EC: Remove non-standard log emphasis
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Zheng, Lv wrote:
...
> > I was using "+++++"/"#####"/"*****" to filter different EC log entries which makes debugging easier.
> > And, if we changed this from pr_info into pr_debug, then we will have nothing in the suspend/resume logs for the EC device.
> > While there are plenty of such log entries for each of other devices.
> > So I really doubt what's the meaning of such a change.
> > Could it improve anything or just make debugging more difficult for developers?
>
> IMO, it's better to introduce such kind of code in the head of ec.c:
>
> #ifdef DEBUG_FILTER
> #define EC_LOG_DEV "+++++"
> #define EC_LOG_CMD "*****"
> #define EC_LOG_EVT "#####"
> ...
> #else
> #define EC_LOG_DEV
> #define EC_LOG_CMD
> #define EC_LOG_EVT
> #endif
>
> And wrap the pr_info, pr_debug using filter enabled new macros - ec_info, ec_debug so that we won't see the filters in the normal dmesg output and the filters are still available for the developers.
>
> Thanks and best regards
> -Lv
I agree, would you be willing to submit it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists