[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54EDF79B.80805@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:26:03 +0100
From: Robert Abel <rabel@...-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
CC: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8 v2] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: change get_gpmc_timing_reg output
for DTS
Hi Tony,
On 25 Feb 2015 16:23, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> [150225 05:28]:
>> On 24/02/15 22:05, Robert ABEL wrote:
>>> DTS output was formatted to require additional work when copy-pasting into DTS.
>>> Nano-second timings were removed, because they were not a confidence interval nor
>>> an indication what timing values would result in the same #ticks
>> If they were not is it possible to dump min,max timings that will result in
>> the same ticks?
> Yeah my plan was o display the nanosecond range resulting in the
> same tick value. That makes it a bit easier to compare the timings
> to the data sheet. So maybe show both tick and ns range?
Ah, so my hunch was right. I reimplemented that correctly now.
Basically, your code just went [ticks-1, ticks+1] in ns. But times are
always ceiling(ns / gpmc_[f]clk), i.e. (ticks - 1, ticks] in ns.
Some other patches change as well because of this change, so a v3 is in
order =].
Regards,
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists